I don't think it's about forcing to use a specific editor. Personally I
love all editors that provide shortcuts, macros or whatever to ease
lilypond development. Unfortunately there is not many of them.
So I have the following points:
- put as many features into editors as you can
- put as many real features into LilyPond as you can (for example not
fixed height piano staves, fix the bugs)
- make users use Scheme to get accustomed to it. If you learn
#(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #t) and understand that it is the same
as setting -dpoint-and-click=true on the command line, you won't be
scared by maxima = #(ly:make-duration -3 0) and such tweaks.
- the editor based support has an other advantage: you don't have to
find the correct place to the setting, it will automatically put it to a
right place in the text file.
Bert
Why do you want to force everyone to use jedit? I'm using kate and I'm more
than happy. Unfortunately, now I always have to grep through my .ly files
for "click" to find the correct command, so I'm all in favor of adding such
a "shortcut".
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIe8eWTqjEwhXvPN0RAsm7AJ4uA9tUNhv7BAZa51D4dlp66ZEvJgCgxZT8
rq6c/LPNG54f+V5FaoFtM4Y=
=YqHw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
