Patches look good to me.  Just a minor note, I think we generally use
a different constant - HUGE_VAL - rather than SCM_MAXFLT.


On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a good thing you've brought this up, since that post from Kevin
> and another he posted a few days later include patches which fix both
> of the issues you're experiencing; there were some problems with the
> patches which prevented them being applied for testing, so they seem
> to have fallen by the wayside.
>
> I certainly think they would be a useful improvement on the current
> behaviour, so I've tidied the patches up to make them work with the
> current version; attached is the output of your snippet with the
> patches applied.



-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to