Patches look good to me. Just a minor note, I think we generally use a different constant - HUGE_VAL - rather than SCM_MAXFLT.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a good thing you've brought this up, since that post from Kevin > and another he posted a few days later include patches which fix both > of the issues you're experiencing; there were some problems with the > patches which prevented them being applied for testing, so they seem > to have fallen by the wayside. > > I certainly think they would be a useful improvement on the current > behaviour, so I've tidied the patches up to make them work with the > current version; attached is the output of your snippet with the > patches applied. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
