I'm not arguing - I'm trying to understand. It is not clear to me from the reference manual that I have to put the default staff size in there. My mind suggested that telling LilyPond what its own default is would be redundant, so the other (changed) value should go there. It turns out it was wrong.
Anyway, following your instructions improves matters, though TNR is still substantially smaller than the default font; but it's acceptable now. Thanks, Paul On 22/08/2021 20:30:57, "Valentin Petzel" <valen...@petzel.at> wrote: >Hello Paul. That does not matter. Lilipond will always assume factor 1 to be >staffsize 20. >So when using staffsize 22 you need to use factor 22/20. Please try it out at >least instead of immediately arguing against it. > >Valentin > >22.08.2021 18:42:07 Paul Hodges <p...@cassland.org>: > >> On 22/08/2021 17:20:54, "Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Use >>> "Times New Roman," >>> Note the trailing comma (see NR for the issue). >> Sadly this has no discernible effect. >> I may try to get away with only changing the font in the title fields, >> using markup, which would be no bother. >> >> Paul >> >> PS: >> On 22/08/2021 15:32:23, "Valentin Petzel" <valen...@petzel.at> wrote: >>> the default staff-size is 20, not 22, so you need to divide by 20. >> >> My global-staff-size is 22 (to match another piece, and for printing on >> larger JIS B4 paper)
