I have not seen anything get added to lilypond proper for a long time. I may be wrong, but it's immensely difficult to get changes to core it would seem. Fair enough too. That's why openlilylib exists.
But in fact, while I think this is neat code, I personally strongly disapprove of underlining, single or double, being a dreary minded classical typographer myself, and underlining is generally frowned upon anyway in fine printing (maybe music is not fine printing?) So I would not actually want to see this encouraged, even though I can see people have uses for it. cheerio! Andrew On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 04:21, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > Why not add it to lilypond proper? I think that we would want to be > careful about property names (perhaps with an underline-details property to > minimize namespace pollution), but I think it would make a great addition > to Lilypond. > > > > > > Carl > > > > > > *From: *Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> > *Date: *Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 3:19 AM > *To: *Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com>, Thomas Morley < > thomasmorle...@gmail.com> > *Cc: *Pierre Perol-Schneider <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>, Aaron > Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com>, lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > *Subject: *Re: Double-underline markup > > > > Please go ahead Andrew. In OLL this should be a submodule below > oll-misc.text. > > Best > Urs > > 17. Oktober 2019 11:16, "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com > <andrew.bern...@gmail.com?to=%22andrew%20bernard%22%20%3candrew.bern...@gmail.com%3e>> > schrieb: > > Now this is great. I can volunteer to put this in Openlilylib if all you > authors do not object. Perhaps somebody can make and LSR snippet also. I > personally find OLL much more convenient. but I accept arguments in favour > of LSR also. Can go in both. > > Andrew > > > > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
