Why not add it to lilypond proper? I think that we would want to be careful about property names (perhaps with an underline-details property to minimize namespace pollution), but I think it would make a great addition to Lilypond.
Carl From: Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 3:19 AM To: Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com>, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> Cc: Pierre Perol-Schneider <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com>, lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Subject: Re: Double-underline markup Please go ahead Andrew. In OLL this should be a submodule below oll-misc.text. Best Urs 17. Oktober 2019 11:16, "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com<mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com?to=%22andrew%20bernard%22%20%3candrew.bern...@gmail.com%3e>> schrieb: Now this is great. I can volunteer to put this in Openlilylib if all you authors do not object. Perhaps somebody can make and LSR snippet also. I personally find OLL much more convenient. but I accept arguments in favour of LSR also. Can go in both. Andrew
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
