Hi Aaron, My thoughts exactly.
Andrew On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote: > > It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an omission of tuplet numbering. > The piece seems to omit tuplet numbering in nearly all cases, rather > relying solely on beaming groups to indicate the timing. > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
