On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:12 PM David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good grief :( I selected the MIT license because it's very common, > and in the spirit of, as you write, "feel > free to use it, I don't care." > > Seems I'm not the only one--I read this in the openlilylib repo > (https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/LICENSE): > > "Since most of the snippets are separate entities, > they can be licensed individially. > There are no official rules on licensing (yet); > We suggest that unless otherwise specified > everything should be licensed under the MIT license > as found at http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT. > Any content of this repository that isn't explicitly > licensed is implicitly licensed under the rules of > this MIT license." > > Best, > David N And LilyBin: https://github.com/LilyBin/LilyBin/blob/master/LICENSE DN _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
