" In the context of the Learning Manual, pitches and durations are introduced in section 1.2.1. It seems like it would be unfriendly to clutter that section with a discussion about modifications coming after the note. "
The problem with this attitude is that it is a website and people will enter it using search terms, and could enter from *any* page. Taking a linier approach 'it has been ecxplained elsewhere' does not work. Often people are time pressured (I am very time pressured), and simply want to be able to search for and solve their current problem as quicly as possible. I think this is a big part of why StackOverflow is so successful, the answers are almost always given in context. I am currently writing a website which discusses the capabilities of the Italian ocarina. Many pages duplicate content or say 'please read page xyz first' because I recognise that people will enter the site from any page and I cannot make any assumptions about what they already know. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
