Am 29.01.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
I always thought bar check is preset on???
Example
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.html
-> Bar checks)
I don't see anything about bar checks on that page. The documentation is
here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/bars#bar-and-bar-number-checks.
\version "2.19.80"
\cadenzaOn
mus = \relative {
g'1 | e1 | c2. c' | g4 c g e | c4 r r2 |
}
<<
\new Voice \mus
If i try this with g'1 e1 c2. c' g4 c g e c4 r r2 I get an "opn
end" as Urs described. But then bar check wont help?
Well, you get
/tmp/frescobaldi-n_itt319/tmpg12pvtrh/document.ly:4:21: warning:
barcheck failed at: 1/2
g'1 | e1 | c2. c'
| g4 c g e | c4 r r2 |
in the console output, which exactly points you to the place where the
barcheck failed.
Apart from that it doesn't make much sense to use \cadenzaOn when you
want to have and check bars. Plus: the \cadenzaOn is outside the music
variable and so doesn't have any effect anyway.
Is it possible you mix up bar *checks* with bar *lines*?
Urs
Thanks anyway.
Regards
-------- Originalnachricht --------
Betreff: Re: turning a blind eye to dotted note
Datum: 29.01.2018 11:30
Von: Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>
An: Blöchl Bernhard <b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>
Kopie: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
2018-01-29 11:21 GMT+01:00 Blöchl Bernhard
<b_120902342...@telecolumbus.net>:
Thanks! Usually I take care of the notes in mesures and count correctly,
that was an error by chance I overlooked. So I did not now that
lilypond
behaviour. I was awaiting an error message or at least a warning.
Use bar-checks then.
Cheers,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
