There was such a lot of information in all the responses, thanks.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/bar-lines-and-bar-checks.en.html
Bar lines
Bar checks
I have read this and I think to understand.
\cadenzaOn does not set or check barlines and opens freedom to the user,
nice, I used that already.
Let me come back to my original example:
\version "2.19.80"
mus = \relative { d4 cis8 c8 b8. ais8 a gis }
<<
\new Voice \mus
>>
The point in the example is, that there is one 16th to much in the bar,
not one missing. If I count, I get 17/16 in the bar! And I wonder that
lilypond is seting automatically a barline after that 17/16 without
complaining? In my understanding that is wrong!
What I would do or awaiting lilypond to do is splitting up that last 8th
note into 2 16th note and connect it with a tie! Than this is a correct
notation. The "math", 16/16 in one bar with 4/4 is right.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/ties-and-slurs.en.html
\version "2.19.80"
mus = \relative c'' {
d4 cis8 c8 b8. ais8 a gis16 (gis16)
}
<<
\new Voice \mus
>>
Regards
Am 29.01.2018 um 10:56 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 29.01.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
In my limited knowledge of music I think that bar is wrong because of
the dotted 8th note?
Regards
%\version "2.19.80"
\version "2.18.20"
mus = \relative c'' {
d4 cis8 c8 b8. ais8 a gis
}
<<
\new Voice \mus
Indeed, it is, and therefore you see that space to the right of the
barline. This represents the second half of the last eighth note.
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
