2017-09-16 21:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> If I understand correctly, with this patch [issue 5581] things like >>> below are now possible: >>> >>> xxx = c4 >>> { \xxx -- } >> >> Yes. >> >>> and > >>> #{ $m -. #} >> >> Yes. #m -. should be fine as well. >>> >>> Which is a big, big goody! >> >> Well, it's mostly convenience that allows using LilyPond syntax instead >> of Scheme. > > And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation. Because someone for > some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than > inventing examples using it...
Absolutely no idea which person you may have in mind ... > If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be > too far away... Will do, at least for regtests and as soon as I find some time. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user