2017-09-16 21:49 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> If I understand correctly, with this patch [issue 5581] things like
>>> below are now possible:
>>>
>>> xxx = c4
>>> { \xxx -- }
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> and
>
>>>           #{ $m -. #}
>>
>> Yes.  #m -. should be fine as well.
>>>
>>> Which is a big, big goody!
>>
>> Well, it's mostly convenience that allows using LilyPond syntax instead
>> of Scheme.
>
> And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation.  Because someone for
> some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than
> inventing examples using it...

Absolutely no idea which person you may have in mind ...

> If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be
> too far away...

Will do, at least for regtests and as soon as I find some time.

Cheers,
  Harm

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to