David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:
> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> If I understand correctly, with this patch [issue 5581] things like
>> below are now possible:
>>
>> xxx = c4
>> { \xxx -- }
>
> Yes.
>
>> and
>> #{ $m -. #}
>
> Yes. #m -. should be fine as well.
>>
>> Which is a big, big goody!
>
> Well, it's mostly convenience that allows using LilyPond syntax instead
> of Scheme.
And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation. Because someone for
some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than
inventing examples using it...
If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be
too far away...
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
