On Tue 01 Aug 2017 at 16:43:22 (+0200), Davide Liessi wrote: > 2017-08-01 16:24 GMT+02:00 David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>: > > If there's no difference in the first and last bars of the repeat, > > I'm not sure why you go to the trouble of \alternatives. What is > > stolen gets immediately paid back. I would have thought that simple > > repeat barlines make that clearer. > > What's wrong with using proper repeats?
Nothing at all, in the general case. But the way I notated it, which includes this single line: f4 f8 \bar ":..:" f16 c shows as clearly as the score does that the anacrusis here is not a \partial but merely the completion of a single bar, 8(16), which was the point I was trying to illustrate. No need for alternatives, nor for playing about with skips. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
