Am 29.11.2016 um 08:36 schrieb Johan Vromans: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:25:24 -0500, John Roper <johnroper...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, my name is John Roper and I am a freelance developer who does web >> design among other things. I use LilyPond occasionally and I felt that the >> website needed a little bit of a sprucing up. I decided to see what I >> could do and I have created a new, nicer looking, website based on >> wordpress which you can preview at http://jmroper.com/lilypond/. > I think you have done a great job! This really takes the LilyPond web site > into the 21st century, matching the sites of the competition. > > Much can be said about details but this is an opportunity we cannot afford > to miss.
One thing that has to be said now (should have been said much earlier). If a website based on any dynamically served CMS wants to get *any* chance there must be a totally clear/clean separation from the manuals. These are built during from LilyPond's source and have to be served statically. Additionally there has been *very strict* opposition to anything other than statically served sites for lilypond.org in the past. Not all of the reasons are bullet-proof but most are, and you will not get consent for anything else. As Henning posted while I was writing this you should look up earlier discussions on both the lilypond-user and the lilypond-devel list in order to know what kind of discussion you're dealing with. Urs > -- Johan > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
