Am 29.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Federico Bruni: > What John did can be easily done with a static site generator, which > would have many more chances to get accepted by LilyPond developers.
One point that hasn't been raised in *this* thread is that using any CMS on the donated web space we have is out of question. Anyone wanting to have a WordPress site (or anything else) would have to find a hosting solution for this - and would probably also be responsible for keeping that safe and running. I personally would also be happy to have the website separate from the docs, so it can be adapting to new ideas more easily. But I would much more like to see it created by a static site generator, in a system where the content can be managed as a Git repository. This doesn't say *anything* about the visual aspect of the current proposal, though. Urs _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
