Am 15.01.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Urs Liska: >> In solution G), I think that position 2 is really invalid. How can it >> > have a duration of 1/32 and 1/64 at the same time? > That's true. > I'll have to look into that (obviously the stem is also looking to the > right side and takes more beams than it can handle ;-) ). Thanks for > spotting.
I could already fix that. Yes, it simply took the beam count from the neighboring stem, and I could tell it to take the lower number of the neighbor and its "generic" beam count (i.e. the one for its own duration). I take the fact that I could identify and fix the issue that easily as a proof that my new approach to iterating over the beam is indeed more straightforward and maintainable than the previous code :-) Urs
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
