Am 15.01.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 15.01.2016 01:09, Urs Liska wrote: >> F) is interesting as it*only* has strictBeatBeaming set. >> There is no subdivision in the middle of the beam (7-8) because >> subdivideBeams is not set. However, the beamlets at stems 2 and 10 force >> the subdivisions 2-3 and 9-10, each resulting in the beam count >> corresponding to the metrical value of the right stem. > > This looks odd, since there is such a large gap at 2–3. By mere > intuition, I’d say there should be three beams at this position.
I think it would be rather trivial to do now. But I think the current solution is what people suggested. With music with such short notes (i.e. high number of beams) anything looks quite strange, and I wouldn't want to engrave *anything* without subdivideBeams on. Urs > > Yours, Simon _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
