Am 21.08.2015 um 21:40 schrieb David Kastrup:
Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> writes:
Am 21.08.2015 um 20:45 schrieb Blöchl Bernhard:
Interesting! New rules for basics of music.
I think this is too bold an assumption. It may very well be that there
is one 3/4 measure here, and I would trust the original typeset here.
Not every time signature change is printed in every music. Even if you
see it as a “basic rule”. See for example the last one of
Rachmaninov’s Etudes-Tableaux. Rachmaninov knew what he did.
The point of music notation is that others also get to know what you do.
Ok, I could have been more precise: Rachmaninov knew that others would
understand what he did. He just didn’t overcomplicate things.
I think he was aware that key signatures wouldn’t be necessary at this
place to be unambiguous. The notation and the music is so clear and
unmistakable that I didn’t even notice the time changes for a few days
or even weeks. And when I noticed them I realised that it isn’t
necessary to print them; in a worst-case scenario they would distract
the player from the long musical line. Musical notation always can have
a big influence on musical performance.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
