On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
> Given the fact that you paid a price for not reading the Learning Manual > more thoroughly, would it not make sense to use the Learning Manual as > your text for the module? If there are problems with the Learning Manual, > let's fix them. If there are "optional" tutorials that you want to have > as part of your module that can be worked on independently after working > through the "core" part of the Learning Manual, I think we could add them. > The learning manual will be a core part of the module of course, but I don't expect it to take much time to get through (I will have 22 hours of contact during the module). In general I would like to focus on practical work first, and explain the theory later. You know http://benlemon.me/blog/music/lilypond/operation-lilypond > ? No I didn't know about this, and thank you for linking it. I will take a good look. Kevin
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
