2015-04-22 12:52 GMT+02:00 Calixte Faure <calixte.fa...@gmail.com>: > I always wondered why Lilypond was defined as a program ( > http://www.lilypond.org/) for me it is more (should be) a descriptive > language, that several programs can interpret. >
Only LilyPond as a program can process the lilypond input and transform it into a score. So your view is not correct IMO. You can think of Denemo and similar applications as front-end: they let the user interact with a graphical interface and eventually they invoke lilypond to process this input. > As Lilypond is above all an engraving program, I don’t think we should > work on composing tools. Let this kind of features to other software like > Denemo and co. > I agree. Another work in progress for composing in a "LilyPond environment" is Laborejo.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
