On Tuesday March 16 2004 10:45, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > A single grace notes without a slur but with a slash is trivial to > obtain, see > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-02/msg00122.html
Is there a doc somewhere that would have told me that a grace note with a slur has to go under a phrasing slur since it breaks a normal slur? > > Also, I don't know if anyone's ever brought this up before, but since > > percussion parts are most often one note, there should be a way to not > > type the note name every time...something like this: > > > > \notes { > > \time 4/4 > > c'8 16 16 16 16 16 16 8 r8 > > } > > > > Does that make sense to anyone else? \notes \relative c'{ \time 4/4 c8 c16 c c c c c c8 r } is still shorter in my opinion for pieces larger than a short example. c16*6 would be yet a shorter way though that should make sense. =/ > This feature has been discussed but it was many years ago. > I'm afraid it may lead to strange ambiguities in the > syntax. On the topic of ambiguities, es and ees both are e-flat; I haven't seen it documented or used so I avoid it myself. it it normal, correct, and acceptable for proper style? _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user