On Monday 31 March 2003 05:32 am, Joerg Anders wrote:One reason it is not superflous is that between the D.S. and the segno there can be all kinds of repeated or other structures. See below also.
Hi all!
Some users requested LilyPond export of segno, dal segno ... in
NoteEdit. I've problems to understand the system. (I never was
at music school) Maybe it is too easy ;-) Note! I have to
implement the replay!
Perhaps somebody could give a short answer to 6 questions:
1.) Is the sequence: notes1 segno notes2 dal segno notes3 the same as: notes1 ||: notes2 :|| notes3 So, this form is actually superfluous.(?)
You need to know that after taking a D.S or D.C., repeat signs andThis is the default when there are no other directions.
first endings (alternatives) are ignored, and the 2nd ending is played, unless there is a third.
I don't know why you would call it an illegal workaround. If that's what the composer wants that's what s/he writes. This may occur more often in non-classical music but it occurs often enough to be useful, One prolific source of variation is Mexican Dance music. They even add another symbol called the "otra" to get more variations.An illegal workaround is to have a 1.3. alt and a 2.4. alt. Another is "D.C. with repeat".
Paul Scot
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
