On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 15:08 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Le 05/10/2022 à 14:48, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit : > > On Sun, 2022-10-02 at 16:22 +0200, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > I think we should branch now. What do others think? > > > > Needless to say that I agree, but as you witnessed nobody else bothers > > to reply. > > Silence means consent.
How can you consent to a question, whether to branch or not? This time I even explicitly asked for thoughts. A (stable) release should be a team effort, that's not something a single person should or want to decide... > For you, when would be a good time to branch? I suppose it depends > on your personal schedule to do the 2.24 release. We need an entirely new schedule. If we were to branch, I think we should do 2.23.14 first because it has a number of new features and even convertrules... > > Discussions on MRs opened during the weekend also showed me > > that we're not even on one page for what should still go in before > > branching, > > For what it's worth, if you are talking about !1652 (texinfo.tex > update) and !1648 (extractpdfmark workaround), I agree with you > on those. and !1650 (\simple markup) - at least there I got support from David. > > and now it seems you went back to feature development. > > Not really. I've just flushed my queue of mini-features because > I've equally experienced tiredness. For me, that's more "yes" than "not really"...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
