On Jul 9, 2022, at 11:56, Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > > A third option: get out of this uncomfortable situation by > changing the syntax (it hasn't made it to a stable release > after all) so that which events are included and which > are not is fully explicit in the ly code.
This idea is a bit vague to be called an option yet, and "fully" explicit makes me chuckle in light of issue #34. Are you serious enough about this suggestion to propose syntax that you would consider acceptably explicit and that could actually be implemented? I believe that I have done the best I can on it, so working on my own to find a better best would likely be a waste time. -- Dan
