On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:16 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> wrote:
> > * I'd base it off Git commits rather than tarballs. The tarballs are > anachronistic, and with git commits, it will be easier to build binaries > for pending changes (to make sure they don't break the process). > > Nope, I'm not a huge fan of doing this and actually I'd argue that > tarballs are easier: Just run 'make dist' for your local changes. With > GUB (which is entirely based on git commits for the LilyPond spec?), I > always need to push the changes to a public repository. This has cost > me quite some time in the past days and it just doesn't feel right when > I want to quickly iterate with local changes. > > You don't have to push to a public repo. You can just pull from local repository, no? I think file:/// urls work with Git too. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
