Am Montag, den 02.03.2020, 10:48 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld: > Am Sonntag, den 01.03.2020, 15:39 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: > > > > But fortunately, we are now at the point where 2.20 _and_ 2.21 are going > > to be a thing rather soon. Assuming that things like the Python3 > > migration don't cause more of a standstill for 2.21.0 than we imagine, > > but then one can still decide to stop being disciplined until things are > > fixed enough to get 2.21.0 done. > > Understood. In that case I'll work to prepare GUB for 2.21.0, at least > something I can likely help with.
See https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/71. Incidentally this only works for mingw after #5799 is applied (or at least the first commit). So while it has the potential to break, it actually fixes things 😉 FTR: I guess the offending commit is b51e6224ab ("Issue 5776/1: Drop check for std::vector::data()") where I innocently removed an inclusion of config.hh. I'd argue that it has been broken before, this was only uncovered by removing the include. Regards Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
