Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels <tr...@treda.co.uk>: > >Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM > >> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >> >>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I >>> don't think the NR is suitable, other than to have them listed in >A22. >>> Similarly, they will also be listed in the IR under Scheme >functions. >> >> Are they listed there really? >> I was of the impression that the ly:something functions defined in >> Scheme are *not* documented anywhere. > >You're right. I was misled by the title of A.22 - "Scheme functions". >Having explored how this is generated it seems these are actually >scheme-callable functions written in C++, if I understand it correctly.
Yes, these are the functions created by LY_DEFINE in C++ files. If I recall correctly there was discussion about auto-documenting "real" Scheme functions too, but I don't know where this went ... Urs > >Trevor -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
