Am 01.07.2016 um 09:28 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: >> Hm. If this is a limitation required by the implementation then it's >> acceptable. But from a user perspective I would be very surprised if an >> ID isn't recognized without an explicitly named context around it. Isn't >> that the (one) idea of an ID in general, defining an ID and have it >> addressable from anywhere? > Well, the spanner-id is used right now to have multiple slurs (or > other spanners) in the same Voice. So keeping the spanner-ids in the > current Voice would only preserve the current behaviour, if no other > context is given. But OTOH (IISC) it wouldn't break the current > implementation, as long, as IDs are Score-unique and not only > Voice-unique. My preference would be to place it in the Score-context.
I think for the given task (freeing spanners from the voice context limitation) it is clear that we'll require IDs to be unique within the whole score. Urs _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
