Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > >> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> How does that differ from symbols? >> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as >> LilyPond code, isn't it? > Can you give an example for symbols "entered as LilyPond code" as > opposed to "in the Scheme domain"?
Ah, I mean #(define %9sn5@ "a") %9sn5@ = "a" but ... > > Do you mean "without using #" here? Why would it be relevant to XML how > you entered a symbol? of course that doesn't matter here as you can always write \override NoteHead.id = #'09fjwg@ Well, *now* it doesn't work because it expects a string, but it's not the symbol restriction. Sorry for the noise. Urs _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
