>>> Any idea why this is so? Could you contact the gs people by filing >>> a bug report so that we get an explanation? >> >> If I understand correctly, there is four issues at least. [...] > > Thanks for your analysis.
There is ghostscript developers reply. http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696823 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696824 They seem to want us to not use ghostscript language extension. If I understand correctly, LilyPond option `-dgs-load-fonts' and `-dgs-load-lily-fonts' use the ghostscript language extension `.loadfont'. In my humble opinion, both options should be `deprecated'. I'm trying to remove them used in `make doc' and lilypond-book. https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4882/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
