2016-06-04 15:12 GMT+02:00 Masamichi Hosoda <truer...@trueroad.jp>: >> In addition, the following command sequence succeeds: >> >> lilypond-book aaa-lilybook-test.lytex >> latex aaa-lilybook-test.tex >> dvips aaa-lilybook-test.dvi >> ps2pdf aaa-lilybook-test.ps >> evince aaa-lilybook-test.pdf >> >> aaa-lilybook-test.ps is >16MB again, though. > > Thank you for your results. > > If I understand correctly, it's a ghostscript issue. > > Ghostscript might not be able to handle IPAex fonts that you used. > > Using lilypond-book with `--pdf' option invokes lilypond > with `-dgs-load-fonts' option. > LilyPond with `-dgs-load-fonts' option generates ps file > which is embedded font filename only. > Without the option, the ps file is embedded font glyphs. > > If the glyphs are embedded, ghostscript works fine. > However, if filename are embedded, ghostscript may not work fine. > > In the case of IPAex fonts, > embedded filename brings the ghostscript error. > But, for IPA fonts which are another Japanese fonts, > embedded filename works fine. > > The GUB environment uses IPA fonts instead of IPAex fonts. > So there is no problem.
Thanks a lot for your research and findings! > Would you try the following commands? > > $ sudo apt-get install fonts-ipafont-mincho > $ sudo apt-get install fonts-ipafont-gothic > > IPA fonts are `IPA Mincho' (Japanese serif font) > and `IPA Gothic' (Japanese sans serif font). > By default, fontconfig takes precedence over the IPA fonts than IPAex fonts. As of http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilypond@gnu.org/msg40846.html I had uninstalled Noto and instead installed IPA fonts _and_ IPAex fonts. After uninstalling IPAex fonts - first the test-case worked and now I have success on a full `make doc'. Any chance to get a more meaningful error-message? Or is there any criterion we could select such problematic fonts? Again many thanks, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
