> As of
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilypond@gnu.org/msg40846.html
> I had uninstalled Noto and instead installed IPA fonts _and_ IPAex fonts.
> After uninstalling IPAex fonts - first the test-case worked and now I
> have success on a full `make doc'.
It seems that fonts-ipaexfont-{mincho|gothic} packages
contain a fontconfig setting file that raise own priority.
> Any chance to get a more meaningful error-message?
> Or is there any criterion we could select such problematic fonts?
I've tried some Japanese fonts with `-dgs-load-fonts' option.
"IPAMincho" in ipam.ttf:
fine.
"IPAPMincho" in ipamp.ttf:
fine.
"IPAexMincho" in ipaexm.ttf:
compilation failed due to ghostscript error.
"MS Mincho" in msmincho.ttc:
compilation successful
but all Japanese characters are shown as TOFU.
"MS PMincho" in msmincho.ttc:
compilation successful but all Japanese characters are vanished.
"Noto Sans CJK JP" in NotoSansCJK.ttc:
compilation failed due to ghostscript error.
"Source Han Sans" in SourceHanSans-Regular.otf:
fine.
So most Japanese fonts can not be used with `-dgs-load-fonts' option.
In addition, all fonts of the above without `-dgs-load-fonts' option are fine.
I suggest removing `-dgs-load-fonts' option from lilypond-book.
I think that `--bigpdfs' option is more suitable than `-dgs-load-fonts'.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
