Simon Albrecht wrote Thursday, January 14, 2016 3:34 PM
> On 14.01.2016 16:20, d...@gnu.org wrote: >> The name is rather clumsy (and it does not help that the issue report >> talks about "\RemoveEmptyStavesFirst" while the actual patch and the >> Rietveld review has "\RemoveEmptyStavesAll"). >> >> How about "\RemoveAllEmptyStaves" ? > > Vote taken – what do others think? Definitely better. With this I don't think we need \RemoveEmptyStavesFirst. Is there a musical need to remove empty staves from only the first system? Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
