Am 14.01.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 14.01.2016 16:20, d...@gnu.org wrote: >> The name is rather clumsy (and it does not help that the issue report >> talks about "\RemoveEmptyStavesFirst" while the actual patch and the >> Rietveld review has "\RemoveEmptyStavesAll"). > > That’s already fixed. > >> >> How about "\RemoveAllEmptyStaves" ? > > Vote taken – what do others think?
Sounds good. Urs > > Yours, Simon > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
