On 14.01.2016 16:20, d...@gnu.org wrote:
The name is rather clumsy (and it does not help that the issue report talks about "\RemoveEmptyStavesFirst" while the actual patch and the Rietveld review has "\RemoveEmptyStavesAll").
That’s already fixed.
How about "\RemoveAllEmptyStaves" ?
Vote taken – what do others think? Yours, Simon _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
