Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> writes: > On 2015-09-15 08:36 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: >> >> Don't really like the idea of an undefined status. If we don't go >> for "invalid", perhaps another "closed" status of "abandoned" would >> be better. >> >> -- >> Phil Holmes >> > > Abandoned patches are a bit different from closed issues, IMO. It's > absolutely necessary to keep the list of Open issues to a reasonably > manageable size, so making Abandoned equivalent to closed seems > wise.
No. An issue is not resolved by an abandoned patch. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
