A comment and a question about the status field of the issues list. Comment: with Google code, the status was automatically set to "Accepted" for issues manually entered by a registered user. I see no reason for not continuing this policy, but it does mean that bug squad members (and anyone else entering issues) needs to remember to set the status manually.
Question: there's a number of patches from _ages_ ago labelled "needs_work". I believe we should change them to "abandoned", but I also think that there's no point in leaving them as "new", "accepted" or "started". Seems to me that any with patch:abandoned should be marked with invalid status. Does the list agree? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
