Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > If a patch has been abandoned for lack of skill or time, Status should > go back to Accepted. Though it can’t be said in general: if it has > been abandoned because the developer decided it didn’t make sense, or > if it has become obsolete through other development, then > Status:Invalid will be the right choice. > > I also think that we should deprecate Type:Patch. It doesn’t say > anything on the area in which the patch operates; it’s redundant if > Patch: is set at the same time; and the difference if an issue has had > an associated patch from the beginning or later on is a mere > administrative one and has no relevance for dealing with the issue.
Agreed. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
