2015-05-28 10:41 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > James Lowe <p...@gnu.org> writes: > >> On 28/05/15 07:20, David Kastrup wrote: >>> And no idea what this means for Patchy. >> >> Well you cannot run any of the test/accept/reject scripts. >> >> The last two are not a huge deal but test-patchy means I probably won't >> be able to be as productive during normal working hours as before (i.e. >> I'll need to manually run the test-baseline/apply/check commands. >> >> That's not anything complicated but just a little more (attended) work. > > Well, too much attended work wears people down.
Very true. I was beaten as well: https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4428 I'd appreciate some advice for a dummy. Read that as "advice for a dummy of a trained monkey" ... Right now I'm too tired to try what was mentioned already in this thread cheers, Harm > But with regard to > using Google Code, we are forced into a transition anyway, so work we > invest here will be good for a few months only. Which is still > something. So it may still be worth getting a rough version of > automatism back to work, even though finetuning it would seem like a > waste of time. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
