On 2015/05/17 09:56:01, Trevor Daniels wrote:
On 2015/05/17 07:36:01, Keith wrote: > On 2015/05/15 06:12:38, lemzwerg wrote: > > Given that we are currently producing development > > releases, I suggest that this gets implemented, > > then we simply wait a few months so that people can > > test it in real life, and then we do a final decision. > > If we don't come back with another patch, the current patch will
become final
by > default, but I do think it is a useful choice. > > The addition to Learning Manual: Common Notation gives us some idea
of the
extra > complexity of documentation that comes with \fixed. A similar
change to this
> section was suggested a few years ago at >
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-08/msg00384.html
I'm content with this conclusion. I might even try using \fixed ;-)
Well, I remain unenthused about the new name. Maybe get a vote on the user list, with options \absolute x'', \fixed x'', \octave x''? I think those were pretty much the terms mentioned significantly more than once. https://codereview.appspot.com/235010043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
