Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > And I would really love to see that being part of LilyPond itself and > not only possible to implement in a library. > Firstly because I would like *all* LilyPond users to have that > available and secondly because I would like to add this as a Layout > Control Option to Frescobaldi.
When those goals conflict with placing specific functionality in a library, we have an infrastructure problem. We won't solve that problem by cramming everything into the core, not least of all because such specific solutions cannot really reliably be turned into a one-size-fits-all approach. So it is important _not_ to have shrinkwrapped functionality for a particular purpose _forced_ onto users but have it loadable on demand. And be able to offer choice between one or several different solutions as well as rolling your own. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
