On 2014/10/07 22:30:53, Dan Eble wrote:
* When using original breaks, wouldn't one also want original page
size, staff
size, etc.?
That would not map well to tags. Not without additional facilities, I guess. Still, I think that tags at least address a large enough problem space that making them available on the command line makes sense. And we can still add a macro like (define-macro (tagged tags . body) `(if (check-against-document-options ,tags) (begin ,@body)) to make the document-level tag specification useful in Scheme-provided content as well. https://codereview.appspot.com/150670043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
