Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> "replace" is a bit too generic in my opinion. I rather like the flair >> of \behold. \substitute does not seem all that bad either, however. > > \behold does have flair, but I think it wouldn't really convey what we'd > want. (i.e. pointing out what's already there or revealing something hidden > (like James' \et_voila!), rather than making a change.) > > Anyway, I thought of another one: \swap > > ...to stick with four-letter words like \hide and \omit.
No, the implication of "swap" is an exchange rather than a replacement. Overriding with a specific stencil is going to be verbose anyway. How about "\adorn"? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
