David Kastrup wrote > "replace" is a bit too generic in my opinion. I rather like the flair > of \behold. \substitute does not seem all that bad either, however.
\behold does have flair, but I think it wouldn't really convey what we'd want. (i.e. pointing out what's already there or revealing something hidden (like James' \et_voila!), rather than making a change.) Anyway, I thought of another one: \swap ...to stick with four-letter words like \hide and \omit. Cheers, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-Issue-3918-Add-alternatingTimeSignatures-issue-97110045-tp162462p162650.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
