2013/12/7 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>: > i'm infuriated. A new contributor had turned up, read CG and sent his > patch to the "frogs" mailing list, which, as far as i know, is dead > (and since lilynet is down, i'm not sure it's actually working at > all). > > This is absolutely unacceptable. Not only is our contributing process > complicated, but the instructions we give are misleading! > > I'm so angry that I'll actually go through the CG and update the > instructions right now, and will push directly to staging. I don't > want to waste time on discussions this time, and i dont' actually have > time to go through formal review. Any comments and adjustments are > welcome - please just send follow-up patches.
a first "hotfix" was already pushed (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=fcad9f183bb05f7206427bf5fc1b95fd8209d26e) and i'm working on a bigger cleanup of first 3 chapters now. Misleading information, fear me! best j PS it seems that i overcame my prejudice and actually did `make doc`. It's helpful :) _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
