Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> So far, the attempt to get feedback on this language change has >> failed spectacularly, > > At least I'm all for it, and Janek too. So it's not such a > spectacular failure IMHO. > >> but that is the point of the current review at >> <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/6635050>. > > This is terribly awkward to check. It's far more convenient to do > > git checkout origin/dev/syntax > > then using `gitk' to analyze the last commit (I suppose this the one > you want feedback, right)?
That is the one showing the _possibilities_ of this change. I have checked in a different Rietveld review with just the _necessary_ (given the music function API changes which motivated this change in the first place) convert-ly rules applied under <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/6651053>. But for seeing the _possible_ changes, checing origin/dev/syntax is better. Obviously Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely shows quite a bit of the flavor of the change. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
