>----Original Message---- >From: d...@gnu.org >Date: 03/10/2012 15:04 >To: "Janek Warchoł"<janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> >Cc: <k-ohara5...@oco.net>, <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>, <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
>Subj: Re: Provide \hide and \no functions for transparent and void glyphs (issue 6575048) > >Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> incompatible with my reverse überbikeshed proposal since >>> \un\without would be quite garish >> >> omg lol! >> >> PS i think that sending a request for name suggestions on user might >> be a good idea. Maybe they'll propose something else that fits. > >Call me an optimist, but I think we are good now. > Apologies if this ship has sailed, but has anyone considered \suppress and \unsuppress? DP _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
