On 2012/10/02 00:23:55, Graham Percival wrote: https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/diff/8001/ly/music-functions-init.ly
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/diff/8001/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode649
ly/music-functions-init.ly:649: no = why not use "omit" instead of "no" ? I think that "omit" is more
specific; "no"
is a quite general word and I don't think it makes sense here.
That has been discussed in comment #1 to comment #8 of this Rietveld review. Could you be a bit more specific about why you consider the conclusion of this discussion invalid? https://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
