Still looks good.
\omit is better than \no because 'omit' is a verb like we use in
parallel constructions \override, etc. A verb is appropriate because
your function does perform an action: the \f is conceptually part of the
music but your function omits it from the printed score.
No is used in several senses in English. Here it serves as an article
(like German "kein") but it also an adverb ("nein"). I do not think
Latin languages have a single-word negative article.
{ c\f \no DynamicText c\f\> d\p }
for a moment I read "this might look like Dynamic text but it is not".
What the function does, though, is order LilyPond to henceforth omit
DynamicTexts from the score.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6575048/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
