Mike, On 26 April 2012 08:51, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > On 26 avr. 2012, at 09:05, James wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 26 April 2012 07:55, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 26 avr. 2012, at 07:28, Graham Percival wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Well, right now we have nobody running the automated tests to >>>> check that new patches are ok. So there will be no patches >>>> accepted to lilypond. >>>> >>> >>> I have a meeting in mid-May w/ the University of Paris VIII. They're >>> donating a computer to LilyPond and I'll set patchy up on it. >>> >> > > One thing I'm gonna try to do on that machine is have each index.html > generated by a regtest comparison (along with the log/png/jpg/etc files) > upload to a folder on mikesolomon.org. These can hang out indefinitely and > an automatic e-mail can be sent to the list w/ an alert that patchset X is up > for viewing on site Y.
Still requires 'someone' to 'do' something and then say 'LGTM' and I don't know what the feed back has been with regard to the http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/grand-regression-test-checking.html is this just not the same thing in essence? What about GUB? Might that be a (more) worthwhile 'project' for a machine like this? I've never tried to use GUB myself, but it seems to be something we could perhaps run nightly builds on. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
